-
Recently active
Hello everyone!, I’m working on a website and I’m implementing box embed on iframes to show a preview of my files and I’be stuck because only on Chrome the preview of the iframe isn’t working, The iframe shows the message “We’re sorry, the preview hasn’t load. Please refresh the page.” I’m using Box API to connect and validate my session and bring the shared urls of my files. In firefox and other explorers this works without problems. ¿Any help? Thanks!!
Hi folks, I often use the Box Postman Collection to interact directly with the Box API, so I can troubleshoot my code, or just to see what an actual response looks like. The existing collection only automates the access token refresh for OAuth 2.0, and it is fairly complex to change it to support CCG or JWT, even though a lot of times I wish I had that possibility, so I could work directly with the service accounts. Having said that I wanted to gauge the community interest in supporting access token refresh for CCG and JWT, or anything in between: Developer Token (non refreshable) OAuth 2.0 Client Credential Grant (CCG) JSON Web Token (JWT) Other (leave comment below) All of the above 0 voters Let us know! Cheers
Hello everyone, I’m facing an issue with the speed of the responses I’m receiving from the API. I’m making 100 parallel calls from one user and repeating this process 10 times, resulting in less than 1000 calls per minute. Here’s the code snippet that I’m using: _boxClientCredentialsGrant = new BoxCCGAuth(boxConfig); _userclient = _boxClientCredentialsGrant.UserClient(_testUserId); // This part in paralel 100 times // iterate 10 times var result = await _userclient.UsersManager.GetCurrentUserInformationAsync(); The blue line is the performance in average pro call in this scenario I’m wondering if there are additional optimizations that I can implement to receive faster responses to these API calls and process them more quickly. Has anyone had experience with performance optimization? I’m questioning whether the current performance is acceptable or if there are further optimizations I can make on my end. For example, should I consider using an HTTP client instead of the SDK or any other
Hi Team, We are constantly getting below error when our automated jenkins jobs trying to upload files on box folder: access_token = response.json()[‘access_token’] KeyError: ‘access_token’ The same jobs are working fine on staging server with same configurations means files are being uploaded to box folders using the same app config on our staging server. The issue we are facing is in production jenkins jobs, it was working fine till 24th dec but now continue to fails generating access token. We are currently using JWT without SDK approach. Looking forward for some help. Thanks, Shailendra J
Hello world, I’m writing some code trying to integrate Box Java SDK into my own Android Java code. The URL to invoke Box OAuth2 is built using code like below BoxAPIConnection.getAuthorizationURL(clientId, URI.create("oauth://box.oauth2/redirect"), state, scopes) Whereas state is a random UUID string and scopes is just root_readonly. Using some non-standard protocol name here since I expect app deeplinks will capture the above redirect, then I will be processing the redirect callback in my code to get the access token. However, upon invoking the above code, my Android code isn’t capturing the deeplink URL at all. Traced down a bit revealed the URL returned by box.com server is being https://app.box.com/login/mfa?redirectUrl=%2Fapi%2Foauth2%2Fauthorize%3Fclient_id%3D<REDACTED>%26response_type%3Dcode%26redirect_uri%3Doauth%253A%252F%252Fbox.oauth2%252Fredirect%26state%3D<REDACTED>%26scope%3Droot_readonly# That made box came to nowhere but a missing page. I thought I should expect redirec
Hello, I am experiencing an issue with the NodeSDK, whenever I apply any data shape, to boxClient.folders.addMetadata() it throws a 400 with “message”: “Request contains invalid parameters.”, If I apply a empty object {}, it works without issue. (So I know that i am able to connect, and have permissions ect) The shape of the metadata template is: The relevant code: const metadataValues = { ENTITY_ID: “1234”, is_Active: “1”, is_Found: “1”, }; let response_metadata_applied = await this.boxClient.folders.addMetadata(folder_id, “enterprise_534608”, “ciptemplate”, metadataValues); It throws a 400, with that error. If I apply let response_metadata_applied = await this.boxClient.folders.addMetadata(folder_id, “enterprise_534608”, “ciptemplate”, {}); It works 100%, but the values are of course empty. I have tried all methods of controlling the body: when I look at the error response { “statusCode”: 400, “response”: { “statusCode”: 400, “body”: { “message”: “Request contains invalid parameters.
Hoping someone can help and point me in the right direction Using the .Net SDK using the Access and Refresh Token authentication and when the token expires (via the HttpRequestHandler 401 status code) and the SDK calls the RetryExpiredTokenRequest I get a Bad Request error. If I refresh the tokens outside of the SDK, the code authenticates correctly with no errors. What am I doing wrong? Any help would be greatly appreciated Thanks
Join us live tomorrow with Kyle Adams, Senior Staff Partner Architect at Box, who will be available to answer your questions. Getting Started with Box and Salesforce Experience Cloud Events
Hi, @ajankowski @lsocha, @rbarbosa I use a client credentials grant for accessing my enterprise account. I successfully called the enterprise user API using the boxsdk for python. But now when I try to call any box API using the client I get the following error. DEBUG 2023-11-24 04:13:25,474 oauth2 Refreshing tokens. (oauth2.py:214) INFO 2023-11-24 04:13:52,500 default_network e[36mPOST https://api.box.com/oauth2/token {'data': {'box_subject_id': '30187662834', 'box_subject_type': 'user', 'client_id': '---9or2', 'client_secret': '---nKID', 'grant_type': 'client_credentials'}, 'headers': {'User-Agent': 'box-python-sdk-3.9.2', 'X-Box-UA': 'agent=box-python-sdk/3.9.2; env=python/3.10.12', 'content-type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'}}e[0m (default_network.py:79) I debugged and found that the refresh call is made inside the oauth2.py file in the boxsdk. right when this code is called under the refresh() access_token, refresh_token = self._refresh(access_token_to_refresh) the excepti
I created an Embedded widget and included it into a page. The shared link that is used for the widget is restricted to users with access. When I need to sign in, it opens a new tab, I sign in and it refreshes the original widget. However, when it refreshes, it still asks to sign in. This issue only happens in Firefox. I have cleared my cache and cookies, tried using a different Box environment for the shared link, used Firefox on a server (separate from my local machine) and tried rebooting. None of these have worked. However, I do believe that it was working at some point and then within the widget, I tried to sign out of my account. Ever since then it hasn’t worked. However, I don’t know if this is a cause/coincidence or mis-remembering how it was working before. It doesn’t seem like logging out within the widget would cause it to break for different Box environments and different servers. I have included a screenshot of the view I see before and after it refreshes
Hello, I have a question about the box API when OAuth 2.0 is used. My end goal is to upload a file to box using a bot. The first part of my test is to set up the API and do this manually for now. With this goal in mind, I created a personal box account (my organization suggested doing this) to do testing. Then, I created an application and followed the instructions from box to authenticate using Python and SDK. The problem that I’m facing is that I cannot view my root folder. I get a message saying <Box Folder - 0 (All Files)>. I can create folders, search for files, and upload file to box root folder. I read some of the posts on the forum and I already discarded the possibility that I am using a service account because when I look at my client.user() i see my user ID and email. Also, I’m using a developer token and to my understanding, a developer token is associated with the user who’s logged into the developer console. The code that I’m using is below, thank you! from boxsdk import
Hi, When I use the metadata-query command and try to add more options to query more data about the file creation date using the Fields option or the Extra-Fields option, no results show up, only file name and file id Here is the command box metadata-query enterprise_******.department 1736501103 --fields=created_at ----- File 1342427526557 ----- Type: file ID: ‘1342427526557’ Also need to know the list of options that I can use under Fields and Extra-Fields as the Box CLI is not showing any help or examples for it. Thanks
Hi, I have created a folder inside my enterprise account and shared the content with an individual user outside my organisation. The user created a free account to access the content, and he trying to automate that content download using SDK. While trying to create an app with limited access to download the content the user can’t generate “Primary Access Token” Is the free account have any limitations to create an app to download contents?. Thanks, Aneesh
Hi, We’ve been using the Python SDK to run a nightly job that gives us a list of all the files (and some metadata) in our account. That job historically took about 30 minutes to complete, recursively going through all the directories, etc. As of a few days ago (11/5), though, it suddenly doubled in length, even though the number of files/folders in our account hadn’t changed. So two questions: Has anyone else noticed anything similar over the last few days? Is there a better/different way to get to that data? Our current function looks something like this: def get_recursive_files(settings, client, folder_id, path_prefix=None): file_list = [] folder = client.folder(folder_id).get() for item in folder.get_items(): if item.type == 'folder': file_list += get_recursive_files(settings, client, item.id, path_prefix) else: file = item.get(fields=['id', 'name', 'created_by', 'created_at', 'modified_by', 'modified_at', 'path_collection', 'version_number']) file_path = '/'.join([e.name for e in f
We plan to develop a Box app using .Net. But apparently, .Net seems to be not a popular option based on the traffic here. Are there any reasons for that?
Do I need paid account to utilize the file upload feature using .NET SDK? Also where to find authorization code for my app in the interface? Please let me know and I am stuck on this
I have a Box enterprise account, and I want to create a client object that can perform various operations on behalf of enterprise users. My goal is to access and manage files and folders. To achieve this, I’ve explored two authentication methods: developer tokens and JWT authentication. Is it true that developer tokens should not be used for production? If yes then I am left with JWT Authentication. JWT Authentication: I’ve looked into JWT authentication, which appears to be suitable for server-to-server communication. However, I’m unsure about how to set up the following JWT authentication parameters: jwt_key_id rsa_private_key_file_sys_path rsa_private_key_passphrase Additionally, I would like to know how to create a client object using JWT authentication to access enterprise users’ data and perform operations as the Service Account or individual App Users.
Hi, the grant page shown below appears everytime the user wants to use box. Is this the expected behaviour or is it my incorrect setup?
Hello! I created app as “OAuth 2.0 with Client Credentials Grant (Server Authentication)” and used below python code to get the access token and get a folder info. Im able to get the access token but when I try to get the folder information i get this error {‘type’: ‘error’, ‘status’: 404, ‘code’: ‘not_found’, ‘context_info’: {‘errors’: [{‘reason’: ‘invalid_parameter’, ‘name’: ‘folder’, ‘message’: “Invalid value ‘d_232374452899’. ‘folder’ with value ‘d_232374452899’ not found”}]}, ‘help_url’: ‘http://developers.box.com/docs/#errors’, ‘message’: ‘Not Found’, ‘request_id’: ‘5el5t3hj87nd3i9z’} can any one please help me resolve this error? here is my python code
https://api.box.com/2.0/folders , using this api I passed the access token (bearer) unable to create a folder Json body : { "name": "New Folder", "parent": { "id": "0" } } Response: { "type": "error", "status": 404, "code": "not_found", "context_info": { "errors": [ { "reason": "invalid_parameter", "name": "parent", "message": "Invalid value '0'. 'parent' with value '0' not found" } ] }, "help_url": "http://developers.box.com/docs/#errors", "message": "Not Found", "request_id": "lg7h2vhj99q0o3yb" }
Hi everybody. I am integrating the box into my website. The integration has been completed. I searched the documentation to add the function to copy or move files to another folder but there was none. Do I have any solution for this problem? Thank you very much! I need copy or move function like app.box.com
Hi All, We are facing an issue w.r.t. box file picker on iOS devices. We have integrated file picker as per documentation but while sharing the files and after selection of files, we need to press select button twice to complete the operation and dismissing the file picker.
I am working on an application that requires the ability to retrieve the entire folder tree in a user’s Box repository. I am aware that Box’s API typically requires navigating the folder structure step by step. However, I wanted to check if there have been any updates or new features introduced in the Box API that may allow for more efficient retrieval of the folder tree. Is there a specific API endpoint or method that can help me achieve this ? Thank you
I am creating a Custom Portal ( Box Application ) using OAuth for authentication (NextAuth). The Box environment is configured with SSO via Azure. I’m seeking clarification if this is possible. I recall skimming through the developer site that this isn’t. I’m not able to find that reference.
Hello Box developer community, I hope you are all doing well. I have a query regarding the download of text representations for files, specifically for files that are quite large, for instance, around 5GB in size. I understand that Box provides the ability to download files using their API, and I’ve been successfully using it for smaller files. However, I’d like to know if there are any limitations or best practices when it comes to downloading the text representation of large files, especially when they are significantly larger, like the 5GB example. Specifically, I’m interested in knowing: Size Limitations: Are there any size limitations when it comes to downloading the text representation of a file? Is there a maximum file size that should be considered when requesting text content? API Rate Limit: Does Box have any rate limits or throttling in place for downloading large files? Are there any guidelines on how to handle rate limits, especially for large downloads? Optimizations: Are
9 likes
5 likes
3 likes
2 likes
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.
We use 3 different kinds of cookies. You can choose which cookies you want to accept. We need basic cookies to make this site work, therefore these are the minimum you can select. Learn more about our cookies.
