Skip to main content
Question

WebDAV with Box: still usable?

  • May 23, 2025
  • 14 replies
  • 465 views

Forum|alt.badge.img

According to this official note https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360043696414-WebDAV-with-Box Box does not support WebDAV but it is still usable and I have been doing so for years without any issues. A few days ago the service stopped working without changing anything at the client side and I would like to know if something has changed and WebDAV cannot be used any longer.

Just in case it may help to clarify why it is not working anymore: I get a 502 - Bad Gateway error when I try to determine the resource capabilities with an option request.

Thank you and best regards

14 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img

Hi, 

I'm not sure. I asked an internal person to confirm. I'll report back when I hear from them. 

Alex, Box Developer Advocate


Forum|alt.badge.img

I'm seeing the same issue. If WebDAV is gone, I'll have to stop using Box altogether. WebDAV is standard and cross-platform. Box don't do a client for Linux, which I need to use for work. 🤷


Forum|alt.badge.img

Hi, i have same problem too, we should know if WEBDAV still usable, please can you have an answer?


Forum|alt.badge.img

is there any news on this issue? It looks like there are a few people with the same problem and I guess there might be many other who did not report anything.

I do not need full WebDAV support (would be nice to have though), but an official note confirming that WebDAV access is broken and maybe some workarounds would be nice.


Forum|alt.badge.img

Hi,

I am the Product Manager for Box Uploads & Downloads and would like to give some clarity about WebDav support at Box.

As some of you noticed, this sync method has been out-of-support for close to 3 years now and we strongly advise users and customers to not use WebDav for new applications and use-cases but use our regular APIs instead: we maintain very basic support of WebDav (mostly security-wise) and will likely end-of-life WebDav next year. If you have existing applications that leverage WebDav it would be a good idea to start planning for a migration to our REST APIs.

While I imagine this could be disappointing news, I hope this helps you all  the right development decisions.

Jacques


Forum|alt.badge.img

This Solution is not a news, there are the "we maintain very basic support of WebDav", the webdav now do not work at all... we are happy if the basic function still work.. we do not need anything else...

https://dav.box.com/dav   don't work at all..

this is the return state

<d:error>
<s:exception>Sabre_DAV_Exception_NotImplemented</s:exception>
<s:message>GET is only implemented on File objects</s:message>
</d:error>

thanks


Forum|alt.badge.img

I am also encountering this error.  I have been a long-time user on Linux and appreciate Box's fine-grained sharing controls.  But if WebDAV is no longer working and not expected to be fixed, and if there won't be a Linux client that allows me to treat my folders as an extension of my local filesystem, I will have to look elsewhere.  Very disappointing.


Forum|alt.badge.img

I can confirm the issue. hints to usable alternatives are very welcome!


Forum|alt.badge.img

If WebDAV support is removed, our research group will no longer be able to mount our Box share on our workstation's filesystem.  The Box CLI is really not a satisfactory replacement for this purpose.

With that said, I did some investigation with curl to send a simple WebDAV request to list files in the root directory:

curl -s -D /tmp/boxhead -X PROPFIND --user 'evanw3:@illinois.edu:password' 'https://dav.box.com/dav' > /tmp/box

The header response looks like:

HTTP/2 502 
server: nginx
date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 05:52:34 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-length: 60707
etag: "5ddb8f87-ed23"
via: 1.1 google
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=2592000,h3-29=":443"; v="46,43"

And the reponse HTML shows this page:

BOX2_DucPiJB0DmJz0ayv0WqkBA.png

So Sabre DAV failing somehow but nginx is just feeding us a generic 502 error.  Probably need to actually look at the logs.

 

Compare that against a similar request to the ownCloud demo website:

curl -s -D /tmp/owncloudhead -X PROPFIND --user 'demo:demo' 'https://demo.owncloud.org/remote.php/webdav' > /tmp/owncloud

Header:

HTTP/2 207 
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
content-security-policy: default-src 'none';
content-type: application/xml; charset=utf-8
date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 05:52:56 GMT
dav: 1, 3, extended-mkcol, 2
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
pragma: no-cache
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
server: Apache
strict-transport-security: max-age=315360000; preload
vary: Brief,Prefer
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-download-options: noopen
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-permitted-cross-domain-policies: none
x-robots-tag: none
x-xss-protection: 0
content-length: 1803

And we get a correct file listing:

BOX2_gwblngwtf0f3lIkT2wRiJQ.png


Forum|alt.badge.img

Also, the message posted by 24535619907 is a bit of a red herring.  Browsing to https://dav.box.com/dav in Firefox produces that error because it tries to use the GET method on a directory.  It's not really indicative of a problem with Sabre DAV.


Forum|alt.badge.img

For what it's worth: I have the same problem since the second of august. WebDAV is not working at all and either the post should be changed in that WebDAV has been shut down or the service should be fixed. For me this makes box.com unusable.


Forum|alt.badge.img

We too will have to stop using box as it will fully not be supporting mounting on linux now.


Forum|alt.badge.img

I agree with the former posts. 
Do you know of any way to retrieve the files we used to access through WebDAV ? When I connect to Box, I only see .prop and .zip files which are not the original format.

How can I migrate this data if I can't access it ?

Thank you for your help !


Forum|alt.badge.img

Actually spotted a issue with accessing via WebDAV and to be honest, I am very sad.

OK, maybe it is a time to looking for new cloud service, with WebDAV support. Managing huge archive via web GUI is nightmare.

Regards ...