Skip to main content
Question

Set a subfolder to read-only without having to relocate?

  • April 22, 2026
  • 3 replies
  • 31 views

Is it possible to leave a folder where it is and change its permissions to read-only?

The scenario here is that this is a subfolder of our company wide drive, and we are reorganizing our folder structure and layout. We want to leave this original folder available to all, but force adoption of the new location by making the old one into read-only. However, since this folder lives in a company wide location, everyone has editor access. I can’t flip this subfolder to read-only without disrupting the whole tree. 

Is there a way to make this subfolder into read-only without having to removing it from the folder tree and move it somewhere new. I really don’t want to pull the rug out from the users and have them deal with two new locations versus one new location to deal with. 
 

3 replies

Jey Bueno Box
  • Community Manager
  • April 22, 2026

👋 Hi ​@jyannuzzi, welcome to the Box Community! To answer your question:


No -- not if the subfolder is inheriting Editor access from its parent.


Box uses inherited, waterfall-style permissions. That means access granted at a parent folder flows down to its subfolders. So if your company-wide parent location gives everyone Editor access, you cannot make just one subfolder read-only in place by lowering permissions only on that subfolder.


The key limitation is:

  • You can increase access at a subfolder relative to the parent
  • You cannot decrease inherited access at a subfolder relative to the parent


So in your scenario, making the old subfolder read-only without moving it elsewhere is not supported if the parent remains broadly editable.


What that means practically:

  • If the parent stays Editor for everyone, the subfolder will continue to inherit that edit access
  • Changing that inherited permission at the subfolder level would affect the parent-level permission structure, not just that one subfolder
  • To make the old content read-only, you would need a different structure, such as:
    • moving that content to a separate location with more restrictive permissions, or
    • changing permissions higher in the tree if that is acceptable


Please let us know if you have any other concerns.


  • Author
  • New Participant
  • April 23, 2026

I suspected that was the answer but was hoping for some workaround that I hadn’t thought of. Thank you.


Jey Bueno Box
  • Community Manager
  • April 23, 2026

You’re very welcome!

I’d also recommend submitting this as a feature request in Box Pulse to help improve folder structure and permissions. Our Product Team reviews feature requests and product feedback to better understand user needs, so your input would be valuable. 🙌